So.
Is SAST actually in your past?

SAST has been a dirty AppSec word for years: Generic rules, questionable exploitability, no real context... littered with false positives.

So people had to build their own AI bolt-ons to make it kinda work. Kinda.
‍

We think it's time you let it go and move on.

I'm ready to move on from SAST
↓  See where you are  ↓

The Five Stages of Leaving SAST

DIY Optimist

“We built something ourselves. It works. Mostly.”

Keep the watch. We'll talk later.

DIY Fatigue

“We built it. Now we have to maintain the damn thing.”

We should talk.

DIY Avoidant

“We know we don't want to build this ourselves.”

We should definitely talk.

Proved the concept

“We proved AI can do this. We don't want to turn it into a product.”

This is basically why Prime exists.

DIY is Working

“Ours works. We're good.”

Congrats. Seriously. Enjoy the Casio.

This is some text inside of a div block.

For when you're ready to move on...

Prime was purpose-built for modern Product Security, across the whole development lifecycle.

Because your security should have the same AI advantage developers have.

Prevent

Before the code

Autonomous
design reviews.

Check

In the code

Context and
Guardrails
for agents

Guardrails Scans
(Rules & Policies)

SCA Scans

Validate

After the code

Continuous
White-box
Pentesting

Pass Context

Determine scan
frequency
based on changes

Create new guardrails based on
repeating issues

Pass Context

Determine scan frequency based on changes

Create new guardrails based on repeating issues

One platform across every stage
of software development

Let's talk about replacing SAST

15 minutes. No farewell party required.